Serverless vs Server Architecture: The Hidden Cost That No One Talks About
- Jainam Shroff
- Mar 6
- 3 min read
Let's clarify: serverless systems still run on servers behind the scenes—we don't have to worry about managing those servers ourselves.
This article compares server-based and serverless systems through real-world examples, exploring their advantages and disadvantages. We'll examine when to use each approach, with practical scenarios to help you understand this key data engineering concept.
Serverless vs Server Using Metaphor
Think of it this way: Using a serverless model is like taking an Uber, while using a server-based model is like owning a car.
With Uber (Serverless):
You only pay for the rides you take
Someone else handles maintenance and repairs
It's instantly available when needed
It becomes expensive with frequent use
You have limited control over vehicle type and route
With your car (Server-based):
You pay fixed costs regardless of usage
You're responsible for maintenance and repairs
It's always available
It's cost-effective for frequent, long-term use
You have complete control over your vehicle
Let's dive deeper into the technical details of these architectures.
Serverless Architecture
Imagine a scenario where someone manages a server for you behind the scenes. You don't have to worry about scaling it up or down when load changes—they handle everything automatically. This is precisely what a serverless system does.
Serverless systems run on servers, but they're fully managed. You don't have to worry about scaling, and you only pay for the computing power you use.
Sounds like the perfect deal, right? Well, not quite. There are some important caveats, which we'll explore in the "Which One Is Right For You?" section.
Advantages
Automatically managed infrastructure
Rapid and flexible scaling capabilities
Pay-per-use pricing model
Reduced infrastructure failure risk
Disadvantages
Costs increase significantly at larger scales.
Real World Examples
AWS Lambda Functions: Netflix uses these for real-time video encoding and processing
Azure Functions: Powers parts of Microsoft Office 365's backend services
Google Cloud Functions: Instagram leverages these for image processing and filtering
Cloudflare Workers: Discord implements these for API gateway and edge computing
Vercel: Powers many Next.js applications, including major e-commerce platforms
Server Based Architecture
Server-based systems require hands-on management of your hardware and infrastructure. You need to purchase computing resources based on your specific use case, though scaling can become challenging as your needs grow. Even when scaling is technically possible, the responsibility falls entirely on you.
The main advantage is predictable fixed costs—you can utilize your server fully without worrying about escalating expenses. As the architect of a server-based system, you also maintain greater control and flexibility over your infrastructure.
Advantages
Fixed costs that are predictable
More control over customization
No unexpected cost increases beyond a certain threshold
Disadvantages
More complicated and slower to scale during periods of high load
Higher risk of infrastructure failures
Real World Examples
Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud)
Google Compute Engine
Your on-premises infrastructure
Which One Is Right For You?
Cost
Costs can increase dramatically when your tasks are not small and discrete. As you consume more computing power and memory, serverless system expenses can grow exponentially.
Networking
Serverless systems fail when implementing complex networking features like VPCs and firewalls because they only support simplified networking configurations.
Programming Language
If you want to work with a programming language not supported by a serverless system, a server-based system is your only option.
So serverless vs server which one you will choose ?
Subscribe to my weekly newsletter: https://www.jainamnimishshroff.com/newsletter
Buy the Book: https://amzn.to/41IF5HL
Follow Me On Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ijainamshroff/
Comments